🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy may be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban is "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," said the MEP supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on robust data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when teens turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for minors," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is largely happening at the state government level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted measures requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this international conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.